Rules clarification page 1

nick
26th January 2012, 02:52 PM
Admin action is limited to technical procedures, removing illegal content and spam, deleting spammers and protecting member privacy

Does this mean I am freely able to violate the privacy of non-members?
nostrum
26th January 2012, 03:05 PM
Don't break the law Bart. :doom:


that is all
nick
26th January 2012, 03:08 PM
OK, I won't.

btw is seebs a member here?
nostrum
26th January 2012, 03:25 PM
I don't know.
charlou
26th January 2012, 03:30 PM
you can violate my privacy if you like *swoon*
Fuzzy
26th January 2012, 03:58 PM
Nick you can violate my privacy, but only after I'm dead.
nick
26th January 2012, 04:23 PM
That's not fair, nostrum said I can't break the law :sadcheer:
Brother Daniel
26th January 2012, 04:26 PM
Bart for admin
borealis
26th January 2012, 04:30 PM
There is no bart, only nick.
Brother Daniel
26th January 2012, 04:34 PM
Bart is nick's nick. At least, it's the one of nick's nicks that I know. So don't nix it.
charlou
26th January 2012, 11:12 PM
There's no violation of privacy law here. It's an honour system.
Danny
26th January 2012, 11:49 PM
how's that work then?
Jerome
26th January 2012, 11:54 PM
how's that work then?

I think we are going to find out.
Grumps
27th January 2012, 03:56 AM
There's no violation of privacy law here. It's an honour system.

Correction, there's no violation of privacy rule. I'm certain the laws regarding Privacy very much stand.


/pedantry
Jerome
27th January 2012, 03:59 AM
what about piracy?
Fuzzy
27th January 2012, 04:00 AM
There's no violation of privacy law here. It's an honour system.

Correction, there's no violation of privacy rule. I'm certain the laws regarding Privacy very much stand.


/pedantry

How is the quoted statement in the OP functionally different from a privacy rule?

eta: Especially the following:
Admin action to protect member privacy is limited to the removal of personally identifying information

eta2: Or do you mean with regards to non-members?
charlou
27th January 2012, 04:20 AM
There's no violation of privacy law here. It's an honour system.

Correction, there's no violation of privacy rule. I'm certain the laws regarding Privacy very much stand.


/pedantry

How is the quoted statement in the OP functionally different from a privacy rule?

eta: Especially the following:
Admin action to protect member privacy is limited to the removal of personally identifying information

eta2: Or do you mean with regards to non-members?

We will remove personally identifying information if the member doesn't want it to remain in full view.

We won't take action if members post any other content in full view. So if a member posts an entire PM conversation we won't take any action other than to remove any identifying information, if that is requested.
Fuzzy
27th January 2012, 04:48 AM
Oh. I don't assume PM's are private, so I didn't even consider that.
Cunt
27th January 2012, 05:05 AM
how's that work then?

I think we are going to find out.

Fuck ya, JEROME DA GNOME!!!
PermanentlyEphemeral
27th January 2012, 12:32 PM
what about piracy?

The Crimson Permanent Assurance part 2 - YouTube

Nhận xét

Đăng nhận xét

Bài đăng phổ biến từ blog này

I don^t wanna go to work tonight! D: page 1

Gonzo 14th January 2012, 04:38 PM because then I would have to sleep. >:[ oblivion 14th January 2012, 04:39 PM ((((gonzo)))) triple expresso is thy friend. Daphne Girl 14th January 2012, 04:43 PM Gonzo- Do you work overnight shifts? Gonzo 14th January 2012, 04:44 PM yes nostrum 14th January 2012, 04:53 PM Condolences ((gonzo)) Gonzo 14th January 2012, 04:55 PM IT'S NOT THAT BAD... BUT i NEVER HAVE TIME TO READ ANYMORE, PLUS ALSO POST ON THE INTERWEB, I AM JUST LEAVING MY CAPS LOCK ON NOW BECAUSE IT DOESN'T EVEN MATTER. Gonzo 14th January 2012, 04:55 PM whoa :stare: nostrum 14th January 2012, 05:07 PM :staregonk: oblivion 14th January 2012, 05:08 PM :shockcorn: Mantisdreamz 14th January 2012, 10:57 PM whoa :stare: ((Gonzo)) I've got to work overnight too. and yes, coffee/espressos, etc help. I have yet to try one of those 'energy drinks' that so many ppl i work with like to drink. Apparently it's like having 4 espresso shots in one drink. :stare: Fuz...
Đọc thêm

Railroad tracks in the sky page 1

Mysturji 8th February 2012, 07:01 PM When I was a little kid, I used to like to imagine that high-flying jets leaving vapour trails behind them were laying railroad tracks in the sky, and that behind every such plane was a sky-train. Now, decades later, I still think that is a remarkably poetic image to spring from the mind of a little boy. In the interest of balance however, I should admit that I also liked to imagine - when taking a piss - that any remnant of toilet paper (or anything else) in the toilet was an enemy marine base, and that my penis was an enormously powerful space-based orbital laser with orders to destroy the base. What childhood imaginings do you remember? divagreen 8th February 2012, 07:08 PM I used to pretend my crayons were people and had whole cities made out of cardboard boxes and wore paper clothes. They even had a solid disco gold show and price is right games and a geneology chart. Pretty sure my parents thought that I was dumb and that I just did not kn...
Đọc thêm

Feed Students Semen = Collect Full ,000/mth Pension page 1

Jerome 3rd February 2012, 01:17 AM Feed Students Semen = Collect Full $4,000/mth Pension (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/01/mark-berndt-lausd-responds-to-teacher_n_1247138.html) Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) Superintendent John Deasy confirmed with Fox 11 News (http://www.myfoxla.com/dpp/news/local/lausd-reacts-to-teachers-arrest-20120131) that he has seen some of the more than 400 photos of teacher Mark Berndt allegedly spoonfeeding his semen (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/02/01/excalif-teacher-in-court-_n_1246675.html?1328110095&ref=los-angeles) to blindfolded and gagged students, some with cockroaches on their faces. As the Los Angeles Times reports (http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2012/02/la-teacher-suspected-of-lewd-conduct-keeps-benefits.html), Berndt will receive $4,000 a month in pension for life from the California State Teachers' Retirement System as well as lifetime health benefits from the district. Poor oppressed underpaid t...
Đọc thêm