mindromp

Exi5tentialist 27th January 2012, 07:20 AM Richard Dawkins is strongly against this (http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/jan/26/alain-de-botton-temple-atheism), so I am strongly in favour MSG 27th January 2012, 07:27 AM nope, this time, I agree with RD. a temple of atheism? struth, kill me now... Exi5tentialist 27th January 2012, 07:29 AM I agree with RD Sickoid MSG 27th January 2012, 07:47 AM I do not subscribe to the principle that the enemy of my enemy is my friend :colbert: http://trollcats.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/son_i_am_disappoint_trollcat.jpg Adenosine 27th January 2012, 07:50 AM I'd prefer if they gave the million pounds to charity. That's a lasting temple to atheism. Exi5tentialist 27th January 2012, 07:52 AM I'd prefer if they gave the million pounds to charity. That's a lasting temple to atheism. So utilitarian. Where's your passion for ethereal beauty? Exi5tentialist 27th January 2012, 07:53 AM I do not subscribe to the principle ...

Exi5tentialist 27th January 2012, 07:20 AM Richard Dawkins is strongly against this (http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/jan/26/alain-de-botton-temple-atheism), so I am strongly in favour MSG 27th January 2012, 07:27 AM nope, this time, I agree with RD. a temple of atheism? struth, kill me now... Exi5tentialist 27th January 2012, 07:29 AM I agree with RD Sickoid MSG 27th January 2012, 07:47 AM I do not subscribe to the principle that the enemy of my enemy is my friend :colbert: http://trollcats.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/son_i_am_disappoint_trollcat.jpg Adenosine 27th January 2012, 07:50 AM I'd prefer if they gave the million pounds to charity. That's a lasting temple to atheism. Exi5tentialist 27th January 2012, 07:52 AM I'd prefer if they gave the million pounds to charity. That's a lasting temple to atheism. So utilitarian. Where's your passion for ethereal beauty? Exi5tentialist 27th January 2012, 07:53 AM I do not subscribe to the principle ...

Exi5tentialist 27th January 2012, 07:20 AM Richard Dawkins is strongly against this (http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/jan/26/alain-de-botton-temple-atheism), so I am strongly in favour MSG 27th January 2012, 07:27 AM nope, this time, I agree with RD. a temple of atheism? struth, kill me now... Exi5tentialist 27th January 2012, 07:29 AM I agree with RD Sickoid MSG 27th January 2012, 07:47 AM I do not subscribe to the principle that the enemy of my enemy is my friend :colbert: http://trollcats.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/son_i_am_disappoint_trollcat.jpg Adenosine 27th January 2012, 07:50 AM I'd prefer if they gave the million pounds to charity. That's a lasting temple to atheism. Exi5tentialist 27th January 2012, 07:52 AM I'd prefer if they gave the million pounds to charity. That's a lasting temple to atheism. So utilitarian. Where's your passion for ethereal beauty? Exi5tentialist 27th January 2012, 07:53 AM I do not subscribe to the principle ...

Exi5tentialist 27th January 2012, 07:20 AM Richard Dawkins is strongly against this (http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2012/jan/26/alain-de-botton-temple-atheism), so I am strongly in favour MSG 27th January 2012, 07:27 AM nope, this time, I agree with RD. a temple of atheism? struth, kill me now... Exi5tentialist 27th January 2012, 07:29 AM I agree with RD Sickoid MSG 27th January 2012, 07:47 AM I do not subscribe to the principle that the enemy of my enemy is my friend :colbert: http://trollcats.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/son_i_am_disappoint_trollcat.jpg Adenosine 27th January 2012, 07:50 AM I'd prefer if they gave the million pounds to charity. That's a lasting temple to atheism. Exi5tentialist 27th January 2012, 07:52 AM I'd prefer if they gave the million pounds to charity. That's a lasting temple to atheism. So utilitarian. Where's your passion for ethereal beauty? Exi5tentialist 27th January 2012, 07:53 AM I do not subscribe to the principle ...